Carotid Stent Cell Design: Lack of Benefit or Lack of Evidence?
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Carotid stent cell design: lack of benefit or lack of evidence?
Carotid Stent Cell Design: Lack of Benefit or Lack of Evidence? To the Editor: We would like to congratulate Schillinger and colleagues for their recent retrospective analysis on 1684 patients who underwent carotid stenting with either a closedor open-cell stent design.1 The authors concluded that current data do not support the superiority of a specific carotid stent cell design.1 Although we ...
متن کاملDoes carotid stent cell design matter?
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Carotid stent cell design has recently been suggested to be a determinant of periprocedural and early postprocedural neurologic complications. We investigated the impact of closed- versus open-cell stent design on neurologic adverse events and mortality after carotid artery stenting. METHODS We studied 1684 consecutive patients (1010 asymptomatic, 674 symptomatic) from ...
متن کاملNeural timescales or lack thereof.
This article aims at making readers, experimentalists and theorists, more aware of the abstractions made by an observer when measuring and reporting behavioral and neural timescales. These abstractions stow away the fact that, above lower boundaries that reflect fairly well understood physical constraints, observed and reported timescales are often not intrinsic to the biological system; rather...
متن کاملNeural variability, or lack thereof
We do not claim that the brain is completely deterministic, and we agree that noise may be beneficial in some cases. But we suggest that neuronal variability may be often overestimated, due to uncontrolled internal variables, and/or the use of inappropriate reference times. These ideas are not new, but should be re-examined in the light of recent experimental findings: trial-to-trial variabilit...
متن کاملLack of semantic parafoveal preview benefit in reading revisited.
In contrast to earlier research, evidence for semantic preview benefit in reading has been reported by Hohenstein and Kliegl (Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 166-190, 2013) in an alphabetic writing system; they also implied that prior demonstrations of lack of a semantic preview benefit needed to be reexamined. In the present article, we report a rather direct repl...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Stroke
سال: 2008
ISSN: 0039-2499,1524-4628
DOI: 10.1161/strokeaha.108.521534